Lakshita Mukherjee

Profile description

An NRI who discovers that a First Information Report (FIR) has been lodged against them in India, or that a foreign travel restriction has been imposed, often feels trapped between two legal systems. Lakshita Mukherjee, a seasoned advocate based in Chandigarh, dedicates practice to untangling such cross‑border complications. The Punjab and Haryana High Court and the Supreme Court of India are the primary venues where NRI‑related disputes are adjudicated. Lakshita’s first priority is to understand the client’s overseas ties, the nature of the alleged offence, and the specific provisions that enable the FIR or travel ban.

Lakshita regularly assists NRI clients in filing applications for FIR Quashing under the appropriate provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. The advocate prepares a petition that highlights jurisdictional lapses, lack of sufficient evidence, and procedural irregularities such as non‑service of notice. By attaching passport copies, residency proofs, and evidence of non‑presence at the alleged crime scene, Lakshita demonstrates that the FIR is both premature and unjustified. The lawyer then presents the matter before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, often securing an interim order that stays investigation until the quash is decided.

When the dispute involves allegations of property fraud targeting NRI assets, Lakshita leverages extensive experience in defending against fraudulent claims. The advocate drafts a comprehensive defence that maps property ownership records, tax filings, and transaction histories. By enlisting chartered accountants and title experts, Lakshita counters false accusations of fraud with clear documentary proof. The defence is presented both at the High Court and, where necessary, escalated through a Review Petition to the Supreme Court of India. Successful outcomes have included full dismissal of fraud charges and restoration of title to the rightful NRI owner.

Travel restrictions imposed on NRIs—such as passport seizure or exit bans—present a unique challenge that Lakshita tackles with a multi‑layered strategy. The advocate files petitions challenging the legality of the restriction, arguing violations of fundamental rights to movement and fair trial. By citing relevant Supreme Court precedents, Lakshita underscores that travel bans must be based on clear, substantiated evidence, which is often lacking in these cases. The lawyer also coordinates with foreign consulates to verify compliance with international law, strengthening the client’s position before the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

Clients who turn to Lakshita Mukherjee can expect a proactive, detail‑oriented defence that bridges Indian procedural intricacies with the realities of life abroad. The advocate’s fluency in the workings of both the Punjab and Haryana High Court and the Supreme Court ensures that every filing is crafted to meet the highest judicial standards. Whether the aim is to quash an FIR, defend against property fraud, or lift an unwarranted travel restriction, Lakshita commits to achieving outcomes that protect the client’s liberty, assets, and international reputation. The lawyer’s track record of rapid, decisive victories has earned the confidence of NRIs across multiple jurisdictions.

Criminal Law Practice Areas